2013年11月22日星期五

AnInterview with Mike Matusow

Six months in prison and $1m in
sports betting losses didn’t put Mike
Matusow off his poker, and he's now one of the best in the world
‘I played in the Aruba tournament knowing I was due to go to jail for something I didn’t do, wanting to win so badly. Nobody knew I was going in, but I was playing my heart out.’

Most poker pros are actually pretty dull – more maths geek than movie god. In reality their mystique usually doesn’t extend much beyond a wacky pair of sunglasses or a cool nickname. But then Mike ‘The Mouth’ Matusow isn’t like most poker pros.
His 2005 began in jail and finished with him being crowned the best poker player in the world. In between he made the final table of the WSOP ‘Big One’, won millions on poker and lost it again in sports betting. He’s done more in 12 months than many card cheating of his contemporaries will manage in a lifetime of adrenaline-free poker play. And although he’s been drug-free for over three years, his image as an outspoken, garrulous, party-loving guy is well earned.

Let me entertain you

So when Matusow sits down and quietly orders a Diet Coke, I’m initially concerned I might not be getting the full SP here – except it turns out he’s just suffering from the night before. ‘I drank 15 bottles of Dom Perignon Rose with Phil Hellmuth. We popped up an $8,000 bill, and my head is killing me. The last thing I remember is crying on the bathroom floor, and then the next thing I know I’m waking up fully clothed on my bed.’
It’s entirely appropriate that Matusow should be suffering as a result of Phil Hellmuth. At the recent WSOP Tournament of Champions (TOC) event, open verbal warfare erupted between the two, nearly pushing Hellmuth to breaking point. Matusow jabbed at the clown prince of poker throughout the game, even resorting to childishly singing ‘Philly, Philly, Philly’ at him in an effort to break his concentration. It worked. Hellmuth crashed out in third and Matusow went on to take the title.
‘If every poker show looked like that they could charge $50 a pop on pay-per-view,’ Matusow says, smiling. ‘I was fucking with him, and it was great, great entertainment. The US public watches Phil derail people that he doesn’t even know, but when somebody throws it back in his face he crawls up into a ball like a little girl.’
But that was just a sideshow. For Matusow, winning the TOC – an invitation-only event pitting him solely against the best poker players in the world – was redemption. Proof to the doubters he was one of the world’s best, and the ultimate happy ending to a year scarred by six months spent in a Nevada prison and contemplations of suicide.

So, so Matusow

Matusow is currently negotiating for his as-yet unpublished autobiography to be turned into a film. It’s one hell of a story too – one of the best comeback tales you could imagine. Back in September 2004, Matusow was sitting at a poker table in the Caribbean island of Aruba, trying to find that big tournament win that had long been eluding him. But he was hiding a secret. He was due to start a six-month prison sentence the next day for what he claims were trumped-up drugs charges.
‘I played in the Aruba tournament knowing I was due to go to jail for something I didn’t do, wanting to win so badly. Nobody knew I was going in, but I was playing my heart out.’
He made the final table, going out third with $250,000. But the nervous adrenaline of the poker table was soon replaced by the icecold dread of what was ahead. ‘I was terrified,’ he admits. ‘The entire first week I was worried about surviving. But the truth of the matter is if you have money in jail nobody is going to fuck with you. Pretty quickly nobody was allowed to get within two feet of me.’
Nonetheless, he describes his time there as six months of sheer hell. It wasn’t helped by spending three stints in solitary confinement. The first time was for stealing food out of the kitchen. The second time was when he refused to go back to kitchen duties because of a bad back. The third time was simply ridiculous: ‘They thought I was somebody else. That really sucked. The guard saw me and said: “What are you doing here?” I said: “You tell me!”’

Get into the groove

Such bathos is typical Matusow. His life seemingly spiralling from success to tragedy to comedy and back again. But right now he’s on the strongest upward curve ever. After storming the WSOP and the TOC, Matusow could claim to be the best tournament nolimit player in the world. ‘I’m the hottest poker player in the world right now for sure,’ he says. ‘I’m 100% certain I am one of the top-five no-limit tournament players in the world. But I don’t want to say I’m the best in the world, I don’t believe in that. That Ivey is pretty good – he’s pretty damn lucky too – but he is good.
‘There are a lot of great players, but I’ve always believed my style is right – picking up chips, trying not to top out, picking your spots and trying not to play big pots. The TOC is about beating the best players in the world. And winning that for me was about making a statement – Mike Matusow is that good.’
Going back just a few months, it was all very different. When he came out of prison in early 2005 there weren’t too may people interested in The Mouth. A long-term sufferer from depression, he was on a major low and there was little interest from the mainstream poker world in his future. He could have easily faded into a memory were it not for his spectacular performance at the 2005 WSOP ‘Big One’luminous contactlenses.
Matusow dragged himself shouting and screaming (he was nearly thrown out on day one for ‘improper’ conduct) past more than 6,000 players to the final table. At first he was struggling with the medicine he was taking to control his depression, but his doctor changed his prescription and he got into a real groove. He eventually finished ninth, the only pro to get that far, and received $1m for his trouble. Not that the money lasted long.

Talking about my degeneration

‘After I won I went crazy and lost most of it betting on sports. Me and the NFLare best of friends and mortal enemies. I have to bet every game for US$10,000. I’m a degenerate.’ In fact, after losing half a million bucks on American football in three months, it’s understandable that he has – for now at least – given up the betting game. ‘I live for football, but you have to do what you have to do. The TOC was the biggest week of my life, and a second chance, and I don’t plan on screwing up again.’
He’s given up playing online too, at least for money. For a guy that would regularly win and lose $50,000 a night it’s a major move. During the World Series he would go home after playing and sit for hours at the $50/$100 tables online, often losing $40k in a night. The story goes that his friends had to come round and take his mouse and keyboard away in an effort to make him stop.
‘I used to crush the no-limit online, but I don’t have the focus anymore. I used to beat it like a drum, but there are just too many distractions at home. There are a lot more good players online now too.’
This seeming lack of confidence cuts to the heart of Matusow. For all the bluster, he has a pretty thin skin and it doesn’t take much effort to find the soft underbelly. While his verbal sparring has made him the man viewers love to hate, the reality is he is something of an angel with a dirty face. Speak to the people that know him and they paint a picture of a totally different guy from the one you see on TV – softly spoken and generous with his time and money.
Fellow Full Tilt pro John Juanda became close to Mike when he was sent down, and was one of the few players to visit him in jail. The unlikely duo are now very close friends, and Matusow could be seen cheering loudly from the sidelines as Juanda took on the final table in the Monte Carlo Millions tournament last November. ‘He has a heart of gold,’ Juanda confides to me a little later after being knocked out, a cool $100,000 richer.
Throughout our interview Matusow comes across as relaxed and easy going – if a little twitchy – but it would be wrong to underestimate his daily battle with depression. He was diagnosed with bi-polar disorder (better known here in the UK as manic-depression) when he came off drugs three years ago, but, as he puts it, it had probably already been an issue for some time. ‘I guess I was depressed a lot before then, but I never knew.’ He now takes regular medication and claims to be ‘happy every day’, but the side-effects of the prescription drugs have wreaked occasional havoc on his poker life.
At a World Poker Tour event in Atlantic City last year he went into the final 64 with 5% of all the chips in play and still didn’t make the money. The reason? His doctor changed his anti-depression tablets. ‘I was fucked up on the wrong medicine my doctor gave me and it had me suicidal at the table.

Playing through the pain

‘I went out on a hand where I misplayed every street. Going home, all I thought about was killing myself. I was pounding my head against the wall. I couldn’t believe how badly I played that hand.’ But flash forward six months and how things have changed for The Mouth. Matusow, it seems, has never felt better about his poker.
‘Now that I have finally got some wins under my belt I am enjoying it a lot more.’ And he thinks he has added the final piece to the jigsaw that will allow him to stay at the top of his game. ‘I finally figured out the final table,’ he says with a laugh.
‘I realised final tables were just about patience. And I finally got some cards. As I tell everyone, the cards finally broke even for Mike Matusow.’
About time too.

Vinnie Jones : Poker Player

Hardman Vinnie Jones has been playing cards for decades. He tells Steve
McDowell why he doesn’t want to talk crap – he just wants to play marked cards poker We used to play at Brad’s house. He loves it, gets the draught Guinness in, loads of food. Brilliant

Cards have been the one constant feature of Vinnie Jones’ multi-layered career. Wherever the footballer-cum-actor-cum -greyhound owner has been, he’s never been too far away from cards.
He collected a dozen red ones during his footballing career and still holds the record for the fastest yellow on these shores – just four seconds – picked up while playing for Chelsea in 1992. During his football road trip, which included stops at Wimbledon (twice), Leeds, Sheffield United, Chelsea and QPR, Jones always had a reputation as one of the game’s hardest men. It was this that was to follow him from the midfield to the big screens of Hollywood. Now 41, he’s a man who has done to life what he was once famously snapped doing to Paul Gascoigne – grabbed it by the balls.

Crazy for cards

He began his football career for Wealdstone in 1984. Though he may have been playing the football as a part-time profession, the card schools were full on – a pattern which continued throughout his football career. ‘There was always a card game going on, but some of the biggest games I ever played were at Wealdstone.’
It was with the Crazy Gang of Wimbledon where Jones really made his mark on the football pitch. The Dons’ most glorious moment came in 1988 when they beat Liverpool 1-0 to win the FA Cup final, but even on the club’s most memorable day the cards were still a feature. ‘We had a big old game on the bus to Wembley,’ explains Jones, ‘I won £800 off Wisey [Dennis Wise] playing three-card brag and shoot pontoon. Another time we were coming back from Aintree on the train and Joe Kinnear [Jones’ manager in his second stint at Wimbledon] and me were getting off at Watford. We got into a monster pot and they held the train up for five minutes. John Hartson won it with 10, J, Q, beating my A, 2, 3. The bastard!’
Inevitably, it wasn’t long before infrared contactlenses the Crazy Gang got a bit, well, crazy. ‘We were banned from playing for money on the way to games because of all the rows.’ So dominating was the poker theme during those days that in 1993 the Irish Gardai were mighty relieved when the 62 members of Vinnie Jones’ stag party only emerged once in three days from their Cork hotel room poker school.
‘The biggest hand I ever won was, as so often happens, the last pot before we had to leave for the airport. I was in with one other guy who was sure I had a full house, eights full of twos. He folded three Queens. He doesn’t know to this day what I was holding. I won £15,000,’ Jones chuckles sinisterly.
Following the success of his first proper acting role in 1998 hit Brit crime-flick Lock, Stock… Jones made the unlikely switch from footie to films, and a full-on movie career has followed. When we talk at a celebrity poker event at London’s Sportsman Club, Jones is ‘knackered’ having just returned from filming X-Men 3 in Canada (he plays Juggernaut). The man who has described himself as ‘having an angel on one shoulder and a devil on the other’ is fronting the event for SPARKS – the children’s charity for which he has worked since 1991.
‘I’ve been playing cards for almost as long as I can remember,’ says Jones. ‘I used to play with my Nana when I was a kid, playing a game called Newmarket with all her pennies and tuppences.’ Of course, as his sporting career developed so did the cards, and most of Vinnie’s playing career has been with three-card brag (what Yanks would call ‘English poker’). But graduation to Texas hold’em was only a matter of time.

Pitting star against star

Acting has given Jones both greater fame and also more famous friends to play poker with. He became friendly with Brad Pitt after making Snatch and on his visits to LA. ‘We used to play a lot round Brad’s house – Guy Ritchie, Jason Statham, all of us really. He loves it, gets the draught Guinness in, loads of food. Brilliant.’
Even in Canada the poker itch got a scratch, in that case in the River Rock casino outside Vancouver. Is he famous enough now to be recognised? ‘I’m in my cap and I grunt and moan a bit and people go: “Are you…?” and I say, “I’m here to play cards, not talk bollocks.”
‘It seems to give them what they want because they send a request to my website and ask for a signed photo for their kid, saying, “I’m the guy who beat you with the full house” because they haven’t got the nuts to ask me at the time.’
So does he have any further ambitions in poker? ‘Nah. I just love the buzz of it. I don’t care if it’s $50 or $50,000. I do it for the winning.’ And for a man with an FA Cup winner’s medal and an award for best actor (for Snatch at the Empire Film Awards 2001), you can take it he’s quite used to winning.

Speaking to Mike Matusow

Behind the blow-ups and the trash talk lies one
of the most amazing stories of excess in the
poker world
I was a total degenerate gambler. I was addicted

‘I ’m stuck $60,000,’ Mike Matusow announces, sounding mildly bummed. ‘But that’s okay. Last night I was behind $100,000. And I’ve still got $2m. And, this football season, I’m telling all the bookies that after I fall behind $200,000 I’m fuckin’ walking.’ Matusow stands at the top of a hard-angled staircase that looks down on the living room of his cathedralceilinged 3,700 sq ft home in Henderson, Nevada – a suburb of Las Vegas. His current losses arise from a 24-hour binge of high stakes online Texas Hold’em; his $2m bankroll is bedrocked in proceeds from last year’s World Series of Poker and a first place finish (for a cool million) in last November’s Tournament of Champions. Scrunch-faced and shirtless, hair neatly combed and face slightly stubbled, puffy-gutted Matusow wears a pair of black Nike warm-up pants and is barefoot as he pads down marked cards the steps to his marble-floored living room. He gives a quick tour of his slightly spartan bachelor pad (furniture is all leather, TVs are large, dining room is empty) and shows off the $90,000 BMW 645 CI convertible in his garage. ‘I bought it,’ he says, ‘before the World Series. After I won $750,000 online.’ At this point, though, he neglects to mention that what remained, after the car purchase, was blown in a matter of weeks.
Then he plops down on the living room’s creamcoloured couch, absently fingers a gold chai (Jewish pendant) chokered around his neck, and says that he’s the happiest he can remember being.
For notoriously profane Matusow, that says a lot. He’s a bipolar poker champ – a former speed addict, currently diagnosed with attention deficit disorder. He was released from Clark County Detention Center just prior to the 2005 World Series of Poker, and, most amazingly, nearly won the Main Event along with its first prize of $7.5m.
But it was one year earlier, during the 2004 World Series broadcast, when Mike ‘The Mouth’ Matusow first registered on the public radar. He became famous for leaning into Greg Raymer’s double-chinned face and saying, ‘Buddy, I got big cajones, you got little cajones; you better stop fucking with me. Keep fucking with me and I will bust you.’
Minutes later, of course, Matusow was out of the tournament, literally crying on the shoulder of his friend Phil Hellmuth, while Raymer (who went on to win the Series) counted Matusow’s chips and added them to his stack. During broadcasts of the 2005 World Series of Poker, the public once again saw Matusow mouthing his way through the tournament – still unleashing a blizzard of ‘fucks’ but also putting in a bravura performance.
What they won’t see is the most compelling drama of all, the one that is Matusow’s life – and reflects the lingering dark side of professional poker, a game that now gets promoted as being cleaner than golf. The Matusow story is rife with drug abuse, two-faced friends, overly aggressive cops, topless dancers, a couple of weeks in prison, and a grown man who still thinks like a boy and wants nothing more than the approval of others.
‘Mike is naive for a guy who’s as smart as he is,’ says his lawyer David Chesnoff, the Las Vegas-based attorney whose clients include Suge Knight and Britney Spears. ‘Mike’s got a big heart, and it’s what gets him in trouble.’

Addictive personality

Mike Matusow grew up in Las Vegas. He remembers being a misfit who sucked at sports and got picked on by popular kids. He didn’t bother with college, dropped out of auto mechanics school, and was working at his family’s furniture store when he played his first game of poker. It was actually video poker, in the shabby, off-Strip Maxim Casino, tried at the encouragement of a better-heeled better-looking friend. By the end of the night Matusow had won $85. For the 18-year-old lost-boy, it was the equivalent of taking a first toke of pot that leads to mainlining heroin.
Almost instantly, Matusow began spending his nights in low-rent casinos like Sam’s Town and the Showboat. He relentlessly fed quarters into the flashy-faced, ultimately unbeatable computer-chipped machines, playing so hard and so often that the repetitive motion caused marked cards contactlenses bursts of pain to shoot across his shoulders and down his arms. After going bust to the bandits, Matusow sticky-fingered money from his mother’s purse, and he even attended a couple of Gambler’s Anonymous meetings. But, as he puts it, ‘I was a total degenerate gambler. I was addicted, man.’
What got him off the hamster wheel was an encounter with a fatherly rounder by the name of Steve Samaroff. The silverhaired gambler saw Matusow obsessively playing the machines and wondered if the young man would like to learn a game that could keep him from ever having to work a straight job again. ‘I thought he was nuts,’ remembers Matusow, still not sure why Samaroff approached him. ‘But I took him up on it and he taught me how to play Texas Hold’em.’
This was in 1989, long before the poker boom, and Matusow proved himself to be a natural with a built-in gift for reading opponents, a fearlessness of going broke (‘Mikey almost insists on it,’ drolly states fellow pro Erik Seidel), and an ability to push people in and out of pots.
He quickly worked his way up to Vegas’s large cash games, more than holding his own against blossoming pros like mullet-haired Todd Brunson and motorcycle-jacketed blonde Jennifer Harman. During one memorable run, Matusow won on 81 out of 82 days and pulled down a quarter-of-a-million dollars. Then, in 1998, he backed the bejewelled Vietnamese pro Scotty Nguyen in a World Series of Poker satellite. Nguyen made his way to the Big One and miraculously snagged its million-dollar first prize. Matusow added a sweet $333,333 to his bankroll.

Lap of luxury

Suddenly he was a player, rolling fast and righteous, with enough money that he figured he’d never go broke. He bought the house he currently lives in, began picking up friends’ tabs, spent so much money at Olympic Gardens strip club that he received a lifetime membership, and defied expectations by going broke in spectacular ways – at one point he borrowed $100,000 against his house to get back in action.
Overall, though, Matusow was a talented, winning player who was blessed with a total aversion to doing drugs. Then, in 2000, he busted out of a 7-Card Stud tournament at Binion’s Horseshoe, winning $9,680 instead of the $129,000 first prize that he viewed as his destiny.
Matusow was miserable, and he said as much to his girlfriend, a Puerto Rican stripper with a taste for pills. Hours later, while partying with her at the Club Rio Nightclub in Vegas, Matusow was still bitching. She insisted that he drop a hit of ecstasy, swearing that it would chill him out. Matusow, then 32, had never taken an illicit drug in his life. He sought the counsel of a dozen friends at the club before accepting the pink pill.
He downed it and braced for the worst. ‘I was scared to death,’ remembers Matusow. ‘But suddenly I stopped feeling bad about busting out and I had a great time that night. Next morning I saw the world in a whole different way. I realised that ecstasy is a phenomenal drug.’ He squints, then adds, ‘Man, it’s the greatest drug in history.’

Pills ‘n’ thrills

Matusow took to ecstasy the way he took to Hold’em. ‘My first month of doing ecstasy, I didn’t even play poker at all,’ he remembers. ‘I was rolling five days a week. I was going to after-hour parties till 6am. I was the shit. I had money and I gave the drug away. You need a pill? Take one. People loved me.’ Suddenly the high school dork was a drug-slinging stud, brimming with confidence and operating like a bonafide king of the night.
Ultimately Matusow settled into a routine: he partied from Friday till Monday, often staying up for 72 hours straight, high on cocktails of cocaine and ecstasy; then he played poker on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday. He dubbed the start of his working week ‘Black Tuesday’ and made the most of his party nights.
‘I’d bring half the club back to my house in a limo-bus; there’d be naked chicks everywhere,’ says Matusow. He points to where I’m sitting and asks, ‘You know how many chicks did each other on that couch? One night, this girl, a porn star, she wound up doing 10 chicks in a row.’ Told that it sounds like he had a rock star existence, Matusow snaps back, ‘I lived better than a rock star.’
But the hard partying took its toll. Within a year, Matusow found it impossible to read opponents at the poker table. His cognitive skills were shot. He couldn’t focus and it was costing him: ‘Drugs ate away my brain and I couldn’t play. Try being a poker player, going to the table and having your talent gone.’ During the 2001 World Series of Poker Matusow couldn’t get it together at all. He failed to have a single in-the-money finish and began to panic.

The drugs don’t work

Then a girlfriend suggested he should try speed. A common drug among poker pros (and the downfall of many), it keeps players awake and allows them to focus intensely on specific tasks. At the start of the 2001 World Championship, a five-day event that year with 613 competitors each putting up a $10,000 entry fee, Matusow snorted his first line of methamphetamine. The impact was immediate. ‘I began playing at a level I’d never played at before,’ says Matusow, whose A-game took him to the final table, resulted in a sixth place finish, and a payday of $239,765. ‘Every time someone played a hand differently than their norm, I sensed it. Every time someone showed a tell, I saw it.’
But, at least once, he failed to act on his drug-fuelled instincts. They were down to six players at the final table; Carlos Mortenson was in the big blind, and he quickly reraised Matusow’s initial bet. ‘He had most of the chips, and he was the only one I was keeping an eye on at that final table,’ recounts Matusow, who was holding A -2 . ‘Phil Hellmuth was too good a player; I didn’t want to get involved with him. Dewey Tomko was a weak player with no chips; I knew that if he entered a pot, he had a big hand. Phil Gordon had a huge tell – he still has it, and I won’t tell you what it is – so I always knew the cards he was holding. My focus was on Carlos, and when he raised me I was 100 percent sure he had nothing. So I re-raised him. He looked over at my stack and went all-in.’
Matusow knew what to do, but he had a hard time convincing himself to pull the trigger and put the tournament at risk. ‘I sat there and studied him for what felt like an hour,’ says Matusow. ‘I had Ace-fucking-high. There was a million-point-two sitting in the pot. I knew he had nothing. As I got ready to call him, though, I wondered what would happen if I was wrong. I’d be the laughing stock of poker. I couldn’t take the chance. I folded, and he showed the whole world Q-8 off-suit.’
Matusow jumped out of his seat and jackknifed his body, looking physically tormented. ‘It devastated me; after that loss I had so much negative energy running through me that I couldn’t win,’ he continues. ‘For six months I couldn’t live with the fact that I didn’t call him, even though I knew what he had. I got to within not-followingmy- read of winning the World Series that year.’
Does Matusow think the speed influenced the secondguessing of his instincts? ‘No. It’s because of the speed that I knew he had nothing. Speed didn’t hurt me until two years down the road.’
Crystal meth became Matusow’s poker stimulant; cocaine and ecstasy remained his party drugs. Everything seemed to be in perfect balance. ‘At that point [aided by the drug] Mike’s senses were sharp and he was at the top of his game,’ says Medi Gerami, a poker pro who had been rooming with Matusow at the time. ‘He didn’t get tired. He could have gone for eight hours and played his best game. But the problem [with using meth] is that all of a sudden you’re playing for 48 hours and your best game is long gone.’

Wash ‘n’ go

In September 2002, Matusow found himself hosting a bash at the Palms casino for 30 of his closest friends. He rented a private VIP booth, high above the dancefloor of Rain, on the occasion of a theme party there called Pimps and Hos. The booth cost $5,000 for the night, and Matusow defrayed its expense by charging friends $250 per person for access to the booth and multiple doses of ecstasy. Prior to the bash, a large group convened at Matusow’s home. One by one, they gave him his money and received two hits to start the night.
Among those in attendance was a high stakes player who brought along a friend named Mike Fento. A husky guy with swept back brown hair and a goatee, Fento handed Matusow $250 and received a pair of ecstasy tabs. He hung out for a while, chatted, and soon left, driving off in his black Mercedes Benz. The party was a gas, Matusow lost a bit of money on the whole thing, but he didn’t care (there was never a profit motive) and he didn’t think much about Fento.
Fento, on the other hand, seemed magnetically drawn to Matusow. He suddenly became a consistent presence in the poker pro’s life, treating him to dinners, taking him out to the movies, being available when The Mouth needed to vent – and that’s no small task. ‘Mike always needs somebody, the same person, that he can talk to about poker,’ says Matt Lefkowitz, a pro and long-time friend of Matusow’s. ‘He’ll talk a lot about his wins and losses, mistakes he made, bad beats he endured. And embarrassment is never an issue with Mike.’
In turn, Fento opened up to Matusow. He confided that he was involved with a large organised crime family in Chicago and came to Vegas with the intention of opening a strip club. Fento mentioned that his group needed a way to launder money, and he offered Matusow $6,000 for every $100,000 he could wash. ‘I have some Bellagio poker chips I can give you,’ Matusow cluelessly replied. ‘But that’s about it. I’m not really involved in changing money.’
However, Matusow apparently felt more comfortable in the realm of drugs. So when, on three occasions, Fento asked for help in procuring three ounces of cocaine, 400 percocets, and 400 hits of ecstasy (always for friends coming in from out of town), Matusow obliged. Unaccustomed to scoring in such large quantities, he made multiple phone calls and went to great lengths to get the stuff.
Nevertheless, after Fento offered him $200 for his trouble, Matusow was insulted. ‘I play hands of poker where you can win or lose $10,000,’ he shot back. ‘You think I need your $200?’ Later, though, Matusow would recount, ‘Not many people had ever asked me to get them drugs. But this guy kept pushing it.’
Why did he accommodate Fento? ‘I loved the guy, but I was scared of him,’ states Matusow. ‘I would tell him that I don’t trust people because everyone fucks me. He kept saying that he’d never fuck me. I remember telling my mom [about Fento] and she said, ‘Mike, people like that, don’t ever say no to them. Do whatever they want you to do.’ He was always trying to get me to introduce him to people. And whenever we’d have dinner, we would go outside to talk business. I always thought it was so we could talk in private.’

Sound of the police

The Borgata Poker Open, in Atlantic City, was a bust for Matusow. He didn’t win a dime in the sanctioned event, which ran from September 20-22, 2003, though he managed to get ahead by $60,000 in the cash games.
Better yet, he had spent the last four months drug-free. Matusow bottomed out after a nine-day trip to Paris (with two nights of sleep) followed by a 48-hour speed and booze-fest with a Vegas stripper. Strung out and too messed up to play poker, he realised he couldn’t go on living this way. With Mike Fento nursing him, he managed to get off drugs. It felt nothing less than miraculous.
Flush with money, thinking clearly again – once he was clean, Matusow got diagnosed as having attention deficit disorder and manic depression – and, properly medicated, he now felt appropriately optimistic. Then, during a break at the Borgata, his mobile phone rang. Matusow looked at the caller ID and saw that it was a drug dealer from back home. He answered and barely got out a hello. ‘You introduced me to a fucking DEA agent,’ the dealer shouted. ‘Mike Fento’s a narc. Don’t ever call me again.’ The line went dead.
Shocked but disbelieving, Matusow called a supposed pal of Fento’s who assured him the dealer was delusional, that Fento was a stand-up guy. So Matusow called back the dealer. ‘My brother-in-law is a DEA agent,’ the dealer told him. ‘He and his partner were staking out my house – based on Fento’s information.’
Matusow should have been freaked. But he wasn’t. ‘I kind of laughed about it,’ recounts Matusow. ‘I knew they had nothing on me. Mike Fento knew I wasn’t a drug dealer. I didn’t think any of this was a big thing.’
Because the dealer’s phone line was tapped, the cops knew their operation had been compromised. So at 9.30am, on the morning of September 25, 2003, Matusow was arrested at his home and charged with selling and trafficking controlled substances. Even as he was being taken into custody, though, Matusow believed it was an elaborate misunderstanding that could easily be resolved.
Police officers quickly disabused Matusow of this notion, suggesting that he could avoid jail-time only by turning into a rat and leading them to a local nightclub owner who plays poker and was suspected of being involved in drugs. ‘They wanted me to wear a wire and introduce them,’ remembers Matusow. ‘I wouldn’t have done it anyway, but this particular guy was connected and he could’ve had me killed. The cops didn’t believe that I wouldn’t roll over rather than face time.’
Matusow hired attorney Chesnoff and paid $200,000 for representation. ‘In many respects, the police had a solid case, and they wanted to send a message to the poker community, that drugs will not be tolerated on the Vegas Strip,’ says Chesnoff. ‘But I quickly went from planning a defence against entrapment to begging and pleading for six months in county – which is a lot different from spending 10 years in a federal prison, a place where Mike Matusow would not have fared very well.’
In all of this misery, though, there was a bright spot. In September 2004, one week before entering the Clark County Detention Center, Matusow came third at the UltimateBet.com Poker Classic in Aruba and won $250,000. That money was welcome, but it did only so much to assuage the pain of multiple betrayals. And he sought closure during his last encounter with Mike Fento, now identified as Las Vegas Police Department sergeant. Sitting through his preliminary hearing at the Clark County Courthouse, bawling uncontrollably, Matusow asked the undercover cop why he had taken things so far. ‘You know I’m not a dealer,’ Matusow cried.
The cop smiled tightly and patted Matusow on the knee. ‘This’ll be the best thing for you,’ he promised.

Broken man

During the course of six months behind bars, Matusow managed to blow his $250,000 on football bets, made from the prison phones, with bookies on the outside. Returning home flat broke Matusow was desperate for a bankroll. He borrowed $5,000 from Phil Hellmuth, and, during a remarkable rush online, ran it up to $750,000. He used some of that money to buy his BMW, spent a couple of hundred thousand in paying off debts, and entered the first tournament of the 2005 World Series of Poker with refined focus and a great attitude.
Matusow was quickly in line to win the very first tournament of the Series. Then, on the second day something went kablooey in his brain. ‘I slipped into severe depression and all of a sudden felt suicidal,’ recounts Matusow. ‘Can you imagine playing poker and all you’re doing is thinking about ways to kill yourself?’
Matusow blew his plum opportunity and that made him even more despondent. Next day he went to his psychiatrist and it turned out that his medication had gotten screwed up when he was in jail. He had stopped taking Depakote, a mood stabiliser that treats manic depression. The residue left in his body had kept him straight up until that day.
The doctor wrote a fresh prescription, but it would take weeks to build back up again. ‘Over the next 21 days I lost every tournament at the Series,’ remembers Matusow. ‘Then I’d come home, play online, and lose there. I went through my entire bankroll – until I was broke. A couple of friends came by and took away my keyboard and mouse. When it came time for the Main Event, I didn’t even want to play. I expected to get knocked out on the first day.’
But quite the opposite happened. As abruptly as the Depakote drained from his bloodstream, that’s how suddenly it built back up. Properly medicated, completely off illicit drugs, Matusow played powerful poker. He found good opportunities in which to gamble, ruthlessly capitalised on opponents’ weaknesses, and pretty much buzz-sawed through the field. ‘During days two through six I played at a very high level,’ recalls Matusow. ‘I was stealing pots and playing real poker. I’d come home every night and jump up and down like a little kid. I was so happy with myself.’
Outlasting nearly 6,000 opponents, Matusow made the final table of nine players. He was the most seasoned guy left in the tournament, went in with the fourth biggest chip stack ($7,410,000) and looked like a favourite to win the $7.5m first prize. ‘I had a good night’s sleep,’ says Matusow. ‘I felt good and went in there not to win, but to make things happen for myself. I was the only player at that table who wasn’t scared, and my plan was to play fast.’
True to his word, on the second hand of the day, Matusow pushed all-in with wired Kings and got called by Scott Lazar who revealed a pair of Aces. ‘The first thing that went through my mind when I saw those Aces was that it just couldn’t be happening,’ says Matusow, who had twice the chips of his opponent. ‘I had a smirk on my face because I immediately became resigned to losing half my stack and still having a shot at winning the tournament.’
Then, miracle of miracles, Matusow caught a third King on the flop – ‘That card came and I was higher than life’ – only to be beaten when his opponent rivered a flush. Shortly after Matusow, steaming a little, made a $2m mistake by misplaying a hand against Andrew Black. Then 90 or so minutes into the final day, Matusow busted out after going all-in with pocket Tens against Steve Dannenmann’s semi-bluff (he had two over-cards and an inside straight draw; he made his straight on the turn). ‘I looked that guy in the eye and knew he had nothing,’ says Matusow. ‘I put my chips in and got unlucky, man.’ A victim of two bad beats and one bad play, Matusow softly states, ‘I was shocked to be out in ninth place.’

Fickle finger of fate

Matusow’s mother blames the loss on fate – and she has a point, he did get very unlucky, two times, in quick succession. Gloria Matusow has told her son that maybe he should be grateful for winning the $1m for ninth place, and that he’s better off not having $7.5m at his disposal. On some levels, Mike agrees. But on another, more elemental level, he still struggles to come to terms with the loss.
Matusow’s laying this out as dusk settles over the nearby Strip, and he itches for a few more hours of online poker before exhaustion sets in. Prior to heading upstairs, though, where Matusow will watch TV while putting thousands at risk online, he says, ‘It sucks that I won a million bucks and I was eight players away from winning the biggest tournament in the world. But you can’t look at it that way. If you get fucked and still wind up with a million dollars, it doesn’t hurt so bad. I’m out of jail, I’ve got $2m, I know I’ll never do illegal drugs again, and for those eight days of the World Series I played the best poker of my life. Right now I’m on Zoloft, Depakote and Ritalin, perfectly balanced and happy every day. Yesterday I lost $100,000 and it was still the happiest day of my life.’

Rising Star

Rising Star Liz Lieu shares her thoughts on fashion, fans and the biggest win of her career

Look and learn

When I first started playing, I was very stubborn. If I was stuck in a game, I’d sit for two or three days and play infrared contactlenses until I got even. That’s how it is when you first start off playing – you don’t have the discipline. But, thank god, I’ve passed that stage! You need the experience of winning and losing. I’ve made millions, I’ve lost millions.

Girl power

My heads-up victory over Erik Sagstrom [she beat Sagstrom in a $500,000 limit hold’em challenge] ranks up there with any of my achievements in poker. I believed in myself and I proved to others that I could actually play. It gave me more strength. There are certain people that think women just can’t play, and I know everybody was expecting him to win because he is known as the best online player out there.

Fashion icon

One of my dreams has always been designing my own clothing line because I’ve always been into fashion. I’d love to do that if I had the chance. But I know what I’m best at, and that’s playing poker. I’ve been playing since I was 14 years old, and as soon as I got out of high school I started my own home game. Now I play the $1,000/$2,000 game at the Bellagio.

Golden goal

I started playing tournaments about six years ago, and at first, I’d always go for the win, press my luck and get knocked out. I got frustrated and said to my best friend John Phan, ‘I don’t want to play tournaments again’. But he persuaded me to stick it out. So I did, and happened to make it to the final table in the very first event at last year’s WSOP and got hooked. Now I play as many tournaments as I can. I want to go for the main event bracelet! It’s a sick goal but that’s my goal.

Sharing the pot

Charity work is something that I like to do. I happened to win the limit hold’em event at the LA Poker Classic so I donated 20% to charity. The majority of the money went to MS [research] and marked cards contactlenses the remainder went back to my country to help the poor and the orphanage. Every year, John Phan and I go back to Vietnam, buy tonnes and tonnes of rice and pass it out ourselves.

Fan favourite

I have a good rapport with my fans, and I try and respond to most of my mail. I find it flattering in a way, and it makes me happy that there are people out there really supporting me. I’ve just opened a store on my website because I’ve gotten so many requests for photos.

2013年11月19日星期二

Vicky Coren

One of the most respected females in the game, Vicky Coren tells us about success, sexism and female stereotypes
 The qualities of patience and disguise are more profitable than bluster and a strong right arm
Barbara Windsor is not the answer I was expecting. London EPT winner Vicky Coren is sitting in a north London photo studio talking about women she admires, and somehow we have drifted away from poker and onto the fun-loving buxom star of the Carry On films. ‘All the guys loved her,’ says Coren with a sly smile. ‘But she was always secretly in control.’
Right now, however, it is less clear who is in control. Ostensibly it is the photographer, but you get the impression the subtle charm of the star on the other side of the lens is wielding the most influence. As the team set up the next shot, Coren saunters over to a table in the corner of the room and glances down at a few of our mocked-up covers. She picks up one with the headline: MAN’S GAME? and breaks out into a huge grin. ‘Oh dear – but it is a man’s game,’ she says with a breezy laugh. ‘I hope you don’t expect me to say anything else.’
Vicky Coren seems to enjoy confounding expectation. In person she is charming and a little coquettish, but there is a steel-like confidence behind the soft blue eyes. And, she is simultaneously straight-laced and rebellious: ‘I love the shady characters involved in poker infrared marked cards, but I get very cross if people are rude at the table. I love smoking, and I never take drugs.’
Her first job after graduating from Oxford University was as a stand-up comedian – throwing herself headfirst into an unwelcoming male dominated world. It wasn’t easy, but Coren did it anyway. She admits to always being something of a tomboy – and this was what first led her to poker.
Aged 13 in what she describes as the ‘bitchy and two-faced’ environment of an all-girls school, Coren felt isolated and unhappy. As a result, the cigarette and whiskey-fuelled poker games her brother and his friends played seemed like a breath of fresh air.
‘They were openly rude to each other, and it seemed strangely healthy,’ Coren says. The poker became her way of escaping the claustrophobic school life, and when she went to university, she carried on playing – catching the bus from Oxford back to London to take part in home games.

Unsteady ground

Despite this, it was still several years before she fell head-over- heels for the game. By now she was in her twenties, an accomplished journalist and a member of London’s Grosvenor Victoria Casino. But on her occasional trips to west London, she never made it as far as the poker tables. In a typical scenario for many female players, Coren spent years going to the Vic and playing roulette – too scared to even enter the card room.
Indeed, it wasn’t until she struck up a friendship with Hugo Martin – a regular poker player at the Vic – that she found the courage to first take her seat. As before in her brother’s home games, the rude and uninterested players instantly made her feel welcome. ‘The Vic has a very “London” mentality,’ she says. ‘It takes two or three years before they learn your name, but five or six years later, the same people are your best friends. I love that and feel comfortable with that type of mentality.’
Writing and TV presenting duties continued to fill Coren’s days. However, by the late 1990s, a promising poker career was starting to blossom. She was a regular winner in the pot-limit hold’em games at the Vic and, over the next few years, would regularly walk away around £10,000 in profit for the year. But, in tournaments, despite some small successes, there was little to write home about. Then, on 23 September of last year – on the second day of the London EPT – everything was to change.
‘I’m a cash game player card cheating’ she says. ‘I had won some money before, but my skills were not tournament skills. During the EPT, I felt myself realising things about tournament poker. I felt it happening. In the past, I was just happy to make money from tournaments, but now I felt an urgent and commanding desire to increase the chips I had. Suddenly, I felt like I would rather get knocked out than wait for a good hand. I only cared about getting more chips.’
By the time Coren arrived at the final table, the crafty, cash game side of her game began to fall away, and was replaced by pure, naked aggression. ‘It sounds silly, but I always found it hard to stick it all-in with nothing to pick up the blinds. But as we got towards the final table, I wanted to do that. I became greedy for the blinds.’
The craftiness still remained to an extent; she’s clearly reluctant to give too much away about her tournament game, but admits her approach to blind stealing was more sophisticated than it may appear. ‘People say when you get low on chips you should stick it in with any Ace,’ she says. ‘That is just nonsense, because they will only call you with a hand that has A-6 dominated. If you are sticking your chips in with the hope that people will pass, you are much better off doing it with a hand like 8-6, where your cards will be fresh.’
The change in approach certainly worked. It led to her now legendary win, where she picked up £500,000 and defeated a final table that included US player of the year, Chad Brown. Coren became not only the first female winner of an EPT event, but also the first female winner of any major tour event in the world. It should have been the start of her career as a truly iconic British poker pro, and as a figurehead for women poker players everywhere. But things didn’t quite work out that way.
In 2007, you are still more likely to see Coren at the Vic’s £5/£5 game than a WPT tournament. In Vegas, she will play no higher than $10/$20 no-limit. She continues to live her ‘other’ life as a journalist and TV commentator, and seems happy for poker to remain a lucrative hobby. It’s not as if she lacks ambition. So just what is holding Vicky Coren back? For starters, it is her decision, beyond one-off deals with PokerStars, to not be a sponsored player.
‘I couldn’t comfortably go and play every tournament I want to because it is just too much money. I have been thinking about whether to play the Poker Million, which is $25,000 – but I just can’t justify it. I think it’s funny that you don’t have enough money to play every tournament you want unless you have so much money that winning wouldn’t mean anything to you anyway. People have to be very careful, because you can get addicted to the tournament lifestyle. You can spend fortunes chasing this rainbow around the world and you can end up in a very bad place.’
But there is also a less obvious reason than money. For Coren, the EPT London was as much an end as a beginning. She didn’t automatically assume this was the start of a brave new world of poker riches. She simply feels that for that moment in time, the poker gods were on her side. ‘I played well in the London EPT. I’m pleased to have proven I can win at that level, but there is a lot of luck in tournaments.’
It’s not false modesty; Coren puts it down to one of the more common differences between men and women’s approach to success in the game: ‘Poker tournaments are usually full of men metaphorically pointing at themselves in the mirror and shouting, “YOU ARE A WINNER”. I remember playing in the women’s event at the WSOP, and they were all saying how nervous they were and what a waste of money it was. These women were not worse players than the majority of men – it was just the way their self-esteem was balanced.’
And Coren is not taken with some of the more resolutely male aspects of the game. ‘There is this fad now for guys to turn up to poker tournaments carrying a bottle of water as if they are entering a marathon,’ she says, incredulously.
‘They aren’t. They are playing a children’s game until late into the night. I think it’s silly. Some guys out there think it’s a bit lame to sit on their arse all day playing cards, so they talk about it as a big physical challenge; that surviving through many days of a tournament requires stamina and peak health. Of course it doesn’t. You just sit there like an old grandma ordering buns and tea. It requires no stamina whatsoever.’

How canny

Poker’s athleticism may be up for debate, but as a sport it unquestionably requires a lot of guile. And it’s an advantage Coren thinks applies differently to women than it does to men. ‘Women are socially conditioned to compete more cleverly,’ she says, perhaps with her icon Babs in her thoughts. ‘In social terms, Women are trained to laugh and look admiring, while secretly controlling everything. This makes them good cash game players, where the qualities of patience and disguise are more profitable than bluster and a strong right arm.’
At the poker table, Coren knowingly plays up to the side of her personality that allows people to underestimate her. ‘I have almost no vanity and would never show a bluff out of pride. If people think I’ll play tight and nervous because I am a girl, then hooray for them. And I don’t mind the level of sexism and rudeness that exists. I’ve had ten years of it. I would rather that than the atmosphere at the Rio where you get banned from the card room for telling a joke with a rude word in it. Poker used to be rebellious and counterculture, and I saw that as romantic and exciting. A lot of people started playing poker to get away from a world of health and safety and daylight fascism. Give it another five years and poker hours will be 9-5.’
While Coren may feel comfortable calling poker a ‘man’s game’, she remains effusive in her praise for other female players. She is a huge admirer of Lucy Rokach and Jennifer Harman, while referring to Isabelle Mercier as ‘very cool’. But she is no evangelist for women in poker. If the reason women aren’t playing much live poker is because they don’t like the aggression, then her view is simple: leave them to it.
‘Internet poker, on the other hand, is the best thing ever invented for women,’ she adds. ‘Everything that didn’t suit women about live poker was removed at a stroke. It allows you to be as competitive as you like and you won’t get men giving you funny looks. Live poker, broadly speaking, is a more masculine activity. And a lot of women have better things to do with their time. Women with husbands and children may not have the ability to spend many nights during the week out until 3am.’
Despite her views, you somehow know that if, and when, Coren gets round to family life, poker will still play a huge role. The game fits her perfectly. And, making no bones about it, she is a fine player. If she was American, with her charisma and eloquence, there is little doubt she would be a huge star. But here, in Britain, we reward her poker modesty with relative anonymity.
She’s ninth on the all-time women’s money list, and yet most poker fans would not even class her as a real player. But for as long as people choose to underestimate Vicky Coren, she’ll keep smiling sweetly while raking in the chips. Babs should be very proud.

Phil Galfond

The world of an online high-stakes cash game master is not necessarily fast cars and lavish trimmings
NAME: PHIL GALFOND
AGE: 22
SCREEN NAMES: OMGCLAYAIKEN, JMAN28, MRSWEETS
LIVES: MADISON, WISCONSIN, USA
FAVOURITE GAME: NO-LIMIT HOLD’EM
If you’re looking for shooting stars in the online world of high-stakes poker players, then Phil ‘Jman’ Galfond is a name you will no doubt stumble across.
The 22-year old from Wisconsin regularly infrared contactlenses plays the best players in the world at the $ 50/$ 100 to $ 200/$ 400 no-limit hold’em tables. In fact, such is Galfond’s recognition throughout the online ranks that his Full Tilt alias, ‘OMGClayAiken’, attracts legions of online railbirds. And, such fame has led to him being given a seat on the next series of High Stakes Poker. It’s quite a rise for a guy who only ten months ago could be found grinding away at the $ 5/$ 10 tables – but Galfond is not one to be affected by attention.
What were you doing before poker, and what in your background has allowed you to excel at it?
I was a college student studying philosophy at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, though I dropped out after five semesters. I’ve always excelled at maths and logic. I think those two areas are very important to being a good poker player. Psychology is the third that I’d consider most important, which I also feel strong in.
Can you explain the origins of your screen names?
‘OMGClayAiken’ was just something I thought up and thought was funny [Clay Aiken was the runner-up on season two of American Idol]. Most people like to have tough-sounding screen names and I think that’s stupid. ‘Jman’ is a long story and isn’t very interesting.
Can you give us a brief rundown of your rise to the top?
I didn’t play hold’em until I was 19. I started with sit&gos on Party Poker and played them for a while, grinding my way up from $ 10 to $ 100 tourneys in the first year of my career. Then I moved up to the $ 200 ones and took shots at the new $ 1,000 sit&gos. After that I switched to $ 5/$ 10 no-limit cash games, which was probably a bit high, but I picked it up very quickly and never had to drop down in stakes. That was a year and a half ago.
I grinded up to $ 10/$ 20 and built a decent roll in those games, then took shots at $ 25/$ 50 and $ 50/$ 100 on other sites when the games were good and ran very badly. So, I dropped down to $ 5/$ 10 and grinded back. That was about ten months ago. I rebuilt my roll and eventually card cheating tried the bigger games again. I haven’t really looked back since.
What bankroll approach did you take to move up so fast and would you recommend others to follow it?
I’ve taken some gambles with my roll, but have never been in danger of losing it all. I take shots in good games when I can afford to and I know that I can move back down if need be. Some people take a shot and then can’t move back down if they lose.
They end up losing everything. I think that most people should be conservative with their bankroll because a big loss can be damaging psychologically and end up costing them a lot more money. I’ve found that I’m fairly mentally strong when it comes to dealing with losses.
What do you think sets you apart as a player?
Frankly, I think I’m smarter than most other players. I certainly don’t study or work as hard as some of the other greats, although I do think about the game a lot.
I think I handle different player types better than most people. I adjust well when my opponent likes to bluff, or when they are a bit of a calling station. Many good players just play a style and don’t alter it enough for different opponents. I’m also well-known for making big calls. I find spots where players aren’t representing any real hand better than most people. Some players with bottom pair will fold to a big bet on the river without bothering to think about what their opponent might have.
What is your day-to-day schedule like outside poker?
I have a lot of great friends within poker, but most of my friends in Madison have no poker experience. I like it that way. I have no schedule at all. I often wake up at a completely different hour every day. When I’m not playing poker I like to hang out with friends just like everyone else. I’m a member of a professional improv company. We perform twice a week and teach classes on improv. That consumes a lot of my time – but I love it.
Can you give us an idea of what you’ve made from poker and what you’ve done with the money?
I’d rather not be specific about my lifetime winnings. I do okay, but I’m not a baller [someone who lives a lavish lifestyle]. I’ve never bought anything over $ 5,000. I don’t own a car. I live in an apartment with a college student and pay under $ 500 per month for rent. I don’t really see the point in showing off. My life is great as it is.
You appeared on High Stakes Poker, what was the whole experience like and the standard of play?
I had a very bad experience with being bumped on the High Stakes Poker schedule in favour of other players [Galfond was scheduled to play in the big $ 500,000 buy-in game]. In terms of the skill levels, the $ 300/$ 600 no-limit game was comparable to a $ 5/$ 10 game that you would play online.
The online high-stakes games seem insanely aggressive to many observers. Is this just a reflection of the power of aggression in no-limit hold’em?
Aggression is a very powerful tool. Many people fight aggression with aggression. That isn’t the only way to do it, but it’s probably the easiest. This results in the hyper-aggro games that you see. As far as strategy adjustments go, this means calling down with weak hands, pushing back and thinking on very high levels.
Where do you see yourself in ten years time – will you still be playing and still be at the top?
I really don’t know where I’ll be in ten years. I would like to think I’ll be retired with a family and only playing poker casually. A lot depends on how successful I am in the near future and what non-poker opportunities show up.

An Interview with Duncan Godfrey

Exclusive interview with Duncan Godfrey aka runadrum, freeroll regular and Aussie Millions legend
Duncan Godfrey is a PokerPlayer and InsidePoker reader, who reguarly plays our freerolls, supports our live events, and, oh, he’s just finished 19th in the Aussie Millions Main Event in Melbourne pocketing a tidy Australian $65,000.
We caught up with him on his return to the UK, and got the inside story.
How did you qualify for the Aussie Millions?
I won a $50+$5 satellite and then a weekly final on Blue Square. The first of those was on the night England played Croatia – only 11 people had entered and one of those sat out !
What were you hoping to do in the tournament beforehand, and how did you approach it tactically?
Beforehand I thought no further than surviving the first day because I had failed to do that in the Asian Poker Classic in Goa last year. I hoped I would be able to get near to the lower reaches of the prize money but had no real expectation of it.
At what point did you think you could make the money?
Only when the players finishing 81st and 80th went out and I still had some chips ! I had started day three in 92nd of the 9-6 remaining but managed to double up fairly early on with J-8 of spades versus 7-7 held by Kenna James – the flop included 7 & 9 and the 10 on the turn kept me in when I should have been walking.
The best fold I made in the tournament came just before the bubble when I folded (and showed) Q-Q after a K on the turn joined a flop of x-9-J. My opponent later confirmed that he had made a straight on the turn.
Do any key hands stick out for you?
The two hands above were the most critical in poker lenses my making the money but the most memorable for me were the all-ins which I won on day two against Phil Ivey (my Q-Q versus his 9-9) and Andy Black (my 8-8 versus his Q-Q with an 8 on the flop, and my A-6-d versus his pair, forget how high, which made a flush on the river).
What was the experience like playing on the table with Ivey, Hachem, Black et al?
It was the first time I had ever been at a table of anywhere near that quality so I was nervous at the start but figured I knew more about them than they did about me ! Strangely, being drawn on that table helped me survive day two as I was determined to stay with them as long as I could and, apart from the two strokes of luck against Mr Black, I think I played marked cards pretty solid all day.
What were the best and worst things about your tournament experience?
I enjoyed both my stints on the feature table and hope to be able to see some of it one day. Not to see me but to see whether the series of post-flop folds I made were good! Perhaps the most satisfying moment was during the party after the tournament when a player I had not previously met congratulated me on my play on the feature table.
I have no bad things to report about my Aussie Millions experience other than perhaps small tells of my inexperience – one fold out of turn, some necessary advice from Andy Black on how to shield my cards against the wall (due to the cameras) of the feature table, and one appalling call against Erik Seidel when I convinced myself he might have even less than the nothing I had (if the tournament is shown on TV here I am sure that call will be included!).
How have you spent your time since the win?
For the first couple of hours simply regretting that I had not gone further (whilst trying to tell myself that was crazy considering my pre-tournament expectations!). We enjoyed a couple more days in Melbourne before flying back home and straight back to work the following day.
What do friends and family think about the win, and what will you spend the money on?
Family and friends are really pleased for me and most are wondering what luxuries will now be afforded. I received huge support from my poker-playing friends (mostly on the punterslounge forum) and I guess their expectation would be that I will now have an increased bankroll. The reality however is a lot more mundane in that we have outstanding bills which can now be paid !
Will you still play PokerPlayer and InsidePoker freerolls?!
I’m not ashamed to say that yes I will, especially those which may lead to more opportunities to play in live tournaments.
I am not foolish enough to think that I am now ready to hit the big time. I finished 19th of 780 but personally only knocked two players out of the tournament (although dented a few more). If it wasn’t for the timely arrival of that 10 early on day three I would have exited in about 90th place and then any question about continuing to play freerolls doesn’t arise. I hope to play in another live tournament soon so that I can see if my game has genuinely improved.

2013年11月1日星期五

Balancing Your Range

Whenever you're in a hand, you should always be adding up information and trying to put your opponent on a range.
Many players, however, neglect to think about their own range or perceived range.
This is a mistake. Unless you're playing with complete droolers, your opponent is going to be trying to put you on a range as well.
It's up to you to play unpredictably and make it difficult for him to accurately pinpoint your holdings. You do this by mixing up your play and balancing your range.
The basic idea is that you never want to become too predictable. You want your opponent to know that in any situation you can have any hand.
If your opponent can never accurately put you on a hand, in the long term you will get the most of your battles.
Avoiding Predictable Lines
Say you're playing with an extremely straightforward player. If he flops top pair he will always call down; if he has anything less he folds.
He never raises his draws and he never raises unless he has top pair, top kicker beaten.
Against this sort of predictable opponent you can easily deduce his likely holdings. It won't take you long to know almost exactly what he has at any point in the hand.
That's because he takes very predictable lines. If he has top pair beaten he raises marked cards; if he doesn't, he just calls. Even the most unobservant opponents are going to figure that style out eventually.
It should be obvious why you don't want to play in such a straightforward manner. Your opponents will always just fold when they are behind and call when they are ahead.
When you are so easily read, your opponents can play perfect, mistake-free poker against you.
"Balancing" Your Range
Basically balancing your range means this: whatever action you take can be interpreted by an astute opponent in many different ways.
A few years back in online poker lense, play was a lot different. Players would only reraise you if they held AA, KK, QQ and maybe A-K - but that was a stretch.
This style of play became very easily read. The good players would pick up on it and were able to fold even JJ to a reraise.
As the game progressed, players started three-betting lighter (with worse hands) to exploit other players' folding tendencies. What they actually started to do was three-bet with a more balanced range.
No longer did those three-bets mean they only held a big pocket pair - instead they meant they could have anything from AA to 5-6s.
Since this range was "balanced," no longer could their opponents fold all but their best hands to the reraise. Now they were forced to call reraises with a wider range. This led to the light three-bettors getting more action on all of their three-bets.

Expanding Your Calling Range
Let's say in your online six-max game you play a tight-aggressive style.
You're more prone to flat-calling raises in position than you are to three-betting them. If a player from the cut-off raises, you're likely to call with K-Q, A-J, 99, good suited connectors, etc.
If you always call with that range, your play becomes fairly predictable. Your opponent will realize that if you just flat-call his late position open, you can never have a monster.
To combat this, occasionally you will have to call in position with a monster - for example, AA, KK, QQ. This balances your range.
Now your opponent has no idea what you cold-called with ... it could be 7 8; it could be A A.
Adding to Your Check-Raising Range
Another example is check-raising. A lot of amateurs make the mistake of only check-raising with a monster hand.
This is a mistake because an astute player will catch on and fold everything but his or her best hands - the exact opposite of the goal of the check-raise, which is to get value.
A better way to check-raise is by doing it with a more balanced range. Stop check-raising just your monsters and start to add more hands to your check-raise range - hands like flush or straight draws, top pair hands, etc.
When you check-raise a more balanced range it helps in two ways. At first you are going to take down a lot of pots with semi-bluffs.
As your opponent catches on, he'll start to realize that you don't only check-raise the nuts and he'll start to look you up. Then he will start paying your check-raises off because he isn't sure if you have the nuts or complete air.
By check-raising a wider range your play becomes much more difficult to read. No longer can your opponent put you on an exact range; instead he's going to be left guessing as to what you really hold.
This is your entire goal in balancing your range. You want to make it difficult for your opponents to deduce an accurate range. When they can't put you on an exact range, they'll be unable to make perfect decisions against you.
If they can't make perfect decisions, they're going to be left making mistakes more often than not. And mistakes are like money in your account: every time your opponent makes one, you profit.
In short: avoid playing any one type of hand a single way; instead make sure that every play you make could have a variety of meanings.